@article{21111, author = {Evans R. and Henschke N. and Broderick C. and Kamper S. and Michaleff Z. and Maher C.}, title = {Low back pain in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of conservative interventions}, abstract = {
PURPOSE: To identify and evaluate the effectiveness of conservative treatment approaches used in children and adolescents to manage and prevent low back pain (LBP). METHODS: Five electronic databases and the reference lists of systematic reviews were searched for relevant studies. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were considered eligible for inclusion if they enrolled a sample of children or adolescents (<18 years old) and evaluated the effectiveness of any conservative intervention to treat or prevent LBP. Two authors independently screened search results, extracted data, assessed risk of bias using the PEDro scale, and rated the quality of evidence using the GRADE criteria. RESULTS: Four RCTs on intervention and eleven RCTs on prevention of LBP were included. All included studies had a high risk of bias scoring
}, year = {2014}, journal = {European Spine Journal}, volume = {23}, edition = {2014/07/30}, chapter = {2046-58}, isbn = {1432-0932 (Electronic)