TY - JOUR KW - Adult KW - Female KW - Humans KW - Male KW - Treatment Outcome KW - Middle Aged KW - Physical Therapy Modalities KW - Contracture KW - Patient Compliance KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care) KW - Disease Management KW - Posture KW - Brain Injuries KW - Walking KW - Combined Modality Therapy KW - Electric Stimulation Therapy KW - Foot KW - Splints KW - Tilt-Table Test AU - Harvey Lisa AU - Moseley Anne AU - Leung Joan AU - Whiteside Bhavini AU - Simpson Melissa AU - Stroud Katarina AB -
QUESTION: Is a combination of standing, electrical stimulation and splinting more effective than standing alone for the management of ankle contractures after severe brain injury?
DESIGN: A multi-centre randomised trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding and intention-to-treat analysis.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six adults with severe traumatic brain injury and ankle plantarflexion contractures.
INTERVENTION: All participants underwent a 6-week program. The experimental group received tilt table standing, electrical stimulation and ankle splinting. The control group received tilt table standing alone.
OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was passive ankle dorsiflexion with a 12Nm torque. Secondary outcomes included: passive dorsiflexion with lower torques (3, 5, 7 and 9Nm); spasticity; the walking item of the Functional Independence Measure; walking speed; global perceived effect of treatment; and perceived treatment credibility. OUTCOME MEASURES were taken at baseline (Week 0), end of intervention (Week 6), and follow-up (Week 10).
RESULTS: The mean between-group differences (95% CI) for passive ankle dorsiflexion at Week 6 and Week 10 were -3 degrees (-8 to 2) and -1 degrees (-6 to 4), respectively, in favour of the control group. There was a small mean reduction of 1 point in spasticity at Week 6 (95% CI 0.1 to 1.8) in favour of the experimental group, but this effect disappeared at Week 10. There were no differences for other secondary outcome measures except the physiotherapists' perceived treatment credibility.
CONCLUSION: Tilt table standing with electrical stimulation and splinting is not better than tilt table standing alone for the management of ankle contractures after severe brain injury.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12608000637347. [Leung J, Harvey LA, Moseley AM, Whiteside B, Simpson M, Stroud K (2014) Standing with electrical stimulation and splinting is no better than standing alone for management of ankle plantarflexion contractures in people with traumatic brain injury: a randomised trial.Journal of Physiotherapy60: 201-208].
BT - J Physiother DO - 10.1016/j.jphys.2014.09.007 IS - 4 J2 - J Physiother LA - eng N2 -QUESTION: Is a combination of standing, electrical stimulation and splinting more effective than standing alone for the management of ankle contractures after severe brain injury?
DESIGN: A multi-centre randomised trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding and intention-to-treat analysis.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six adults with severe traumatic brain injury and ankle plantarflexion contractures.
INTERVENTION: All participants underwent a 6-week program. The experimental group received tilt table standing, electrical stimulation and ankle splinting. The control group received tilt table standing alone.
OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was passive ankle dorsiflexion with a 12Nm torque. Secondary outcomes included: passive dorsiflexion with lower torques (3, 5, 7 and 9Nm); spasticity; the walking item of the Functional Independence Measure; walking speed; global perceived effect of treatment; and perceived treatment credibility. OUTCOME MEASURES were taken at baseline (Week 0), end of intervention (Week 6), and follow-up (Week 10).
RESULTS: The mean between-group differences (95% CI) for passive ankle dorsiflexion at Week 6 and Week 10 were -3 degrees (-8 to 2) and -1 degrees (-6 to 4), respectively, in favour of the control group. There was a small mean reduction of 1 point in spasticity at Week 6 (95% CI 0.1 to 1.8) in favour of the experimental group, but this effect disappeared at Week 10. There were no differences for other secondary outcome measures except the physiotherapists' perceived treatment credibility.
CONCLUSION: Tilt table standing with electrical stimulation and splinting is not better than tilt table standing alone for the management of ankle contractures after severe brain injury.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12608000637347. [Leung J, Harvey LA, Moseley AM, Whiteside B, Simpson M, Stroud K (2014) Standing with electrical stimulation and splinting is no better than standing alone for management of ankle plantarflexion contractures in people with traumatic brain injury: a randomised trial.Journal of Physiotherapy60: 201-208].
PY - 2014 SP - 201 EP - 8 T2 - J Physiother TI - Standing with electrical stimulation and splinting is no better than standing alone for management of ankle plantarflexion contractures in people with traumatic brain injury: a randomised trial. VL - 60 SN - 1836-9561 ER -