Diet_disease

Does diet affect the biggest killers of men and women differently?

A new study on diet and leading causes of death finds that those on a low carbohydrate, low fat and high protein diet had a lower risk of early death, but a lower risk of cardiovascular disease only in men.

For dementia the findings were less clear, but women who ate moderate amounts of sugar and high levels of fibre were at lower risk of developing the disease.

Lead author Briar McKenzie from The George Institute for Global health said there was an established link between diet and cardiovascular disease (CVD), the relationship between diet and dementia was less well known.

“There is no cure for dementia and not  many treatment options, so it’s important to focus on prevention and identify things people can do to reduce their risk of developing the disease,” she said.

In Australia, as in the UK, the leading cause of death for men is heart disease, and for women it is dementia.

For this study, George Institute researchers used the UK Biobank, a large-scale biomedical database that recruited over half a million Britons aged 40-69 years between 2006 and 2010. They were asked to complete an online dietary assessment asking what food and drink they had consumed the previous 24 hours.

They estimated participants’ total energy, fat (total, saturated, polyunsaturated), carbohydrate (total, sugar, fibre), and protein intake as well as assessing what percentage of the population were not meeting UK dietary recommendations.

Over 120,000, or twenty percent of the UK Biobank population completed two or more of the 24-hr diet recall assessments, just over half (57 percent) were women. Around two thirds were classified as overweight or obese. In terms of diet quality, they found:

  • 38 percent of the population were consuming more energy than recommended;
  • one third (33 percent) were eating more fat than recommended;
  • almost two thirds (63 percent) exceeded sugar intake recommendations, and
  • nearly all (98%) were failing to meet fibre recommendations.

The researchers then looked at overall rates of death as well as deaths from, or cases of cardiovascular disease and dementia.

“Only carbohydrate and protein intake were associated with overall death rates – those getting the highest proportion of their energy intake from carbohydrates had a higher risk of death, and a higher percentage energy intake from protein was associated with a lower risk,” Briar said.

In terms of deaths from CVD and dementia, moderate total energy intake was linked to a decreased risk. Higher sugar intake was associated with an increased risk of CVD whereas moderate protein intake was associated with a decreased risk.

Men with diets characterised by low carbohydrate, low fat, and high protein intake had a lower risk of CVD.

“Our study suggests the biggest benefit from diet related policy and interventions would be gained by considering combinations of carbohydrate, fat and protein intakes,” added Briar.

“As we also saw sex differences in how diet is linked to disease, we think that that associations between diet and disease by sex should continue to be investigated.”   

Event

Proud in culture, strong in spirit: celebrating National Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Children's Day

georgetalks_10Aug

You are invited to #GeorgeTalks webinar on Proud in culture, strong in spirit: celebrating National Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Children's Day

Join us to hear from:
• Dr. Janine Mohamed, CEO of the Lowitja Institute
• Dr. Julieann Coombes, Research Fellow in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Program at The George Institute.

Moderated by Prof. Bruce Neal, Executive Director of The George Institute.

Dr. Mohamed will outline the importance of services in providing cultural connection, and the key role of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Workforce in the safety and wellbeing of children and families. Dr. Coombes will share her work, ‘Safe Pathways’- a quality improvement and partnership approach to discharge planning for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children following burn injury. A facilitated conversation will follow the presentations.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families and communities have provided love and care for their children for thousands of generations. Safety, wellbeing and development are closely linked to the strengths of connections with family, community, culture, language, and Country.

National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children’s Day (Children’s Day) is an annual day celebrated across the country each year on 4 August. Established in 1988, Children’s Day is a time Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families and communities and all Australians, to celebrate the strengths and cultures of children. This day offers us an opportunity to show support for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and families, as well as learn about the crucial impact that culture, family and community play in the lives of every Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander child. Children’s Day is an initiative of the Secretariat of National Aboriginal and Islander Child Care (SNAICC) - the national peak body for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander child and family services.

Speakers

  • Dr Janine Mohamed

    CEO of the Lowitja Institute and Distinguished Fellow, The George Institute for Global Health

    Janine
  • Dr Julieann Coombes

    Research Fellow, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Program, The George Institute

    Julieann
  • Prof Bruce Neal

    Executive Director, The George Institute

    Prof Bruce Neal
Event

Is High Income Country Health Technology Assessment (HTA) relevant to Middle Income Countries?

HTA_webinar

Resource allocation in health is universally challenging. Pursuing a strategy of evidence-based decision-making and using tools such as Health Technology Assessment (HTA) can help address issues relating to both affordability and equity when allocating resources. HTA is a mechanism or process to support evidence informed decision making in the health system, in a consistent, fair and transparent process occurring within a well-defined legal framework. 

In this webinar, panellists will share perspectives on the current approach to HTA and processes for HTA structure, practices, application, capacity, gaps, and solutions in their respective jurisdictions and what lessons can be learned from the 30 years of Australian HTA experience. The webinar will be relevant to those researchers and policymakers with an interest in Health technology assessment and resource allocation in health.

This webinar is part of the COoperation between Australia and China in HTA (COACH) project which aims to promote China-Australia co-operation in HTA through knowledge exchange and research collaboration. This initiative is funded by The National Foundation for Australia-China Relations. This series aims to facilitate collaboration and learning and provide an opportunity for outreach and connection with the HTA community.

Speakers

  • Professor Stephen Jan

    Stephen Jan is Head of the Health Economics and Process Evaluation Program and Co-Director, Health System Science at the George Institute for Global Health and Conjoint Professor at the University of New South Wales.

    He is an Honorary Professor at the University of Sydney, a Director of the Sax Institute and an Associate at both the Menzies Centre for Health Policy and the Poche Centre for Indigenous Health. He is a current NHMRC Principal Research Fellow and has previously held posts at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and the Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE) in Sydney. Stephen has over 20 years of experience in health economics, has published over 200 scientific articles and authored two textbooks in health economics.

    Stephen Jan
  • Professor Kirsten Howard

    Kirsten Howard is Professor of Health Economics in the School of Public Health at the University of Sydney. Her research focuses on methodological and applied health economics approaches and how these can inform decision making at an individual and policy level. She has extensive experience applied and methodological health economics research, including economic evaluation, decision modelling, health technology assessment, quality of life assessment and measurement of patient and consumer preferences for healthcare. She is the co chair and member of Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) in Australia.

    Kirsten
  • Professor Yingyao Chen

    Yingyao Chen is Professor of Health Services at the School of Public Health, Fudan University (FUSPH), Director of the Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment (National Health Commission) at Fudan University, and Director of WHO Collaborating Center for Health Technology Assessment and Management. He is also the Associate Dean of the School of Public Health, responsible for international collaborations. His academic interests focus on health technology assessment, health policy, health economics, and hospital management. He serves as one of board of directors of Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi). 

    Yingtao
  • Dr Shankar Prinja

    Shankar Prinja is an Additional Professor of Health Economics at the PGIMER School of Public Health, Chandigarh, India. His main research interests involve economic evaluation of health care interventions and programs, costing of health care services, and analysing impact of health financing policies in the context of universal health coverage. He is a member of Government of India’s taskforce on costing for health care services; member of the Technical Appraisal Committee for Health Technology Assessment Board and member of the Expert Group for costing of National Health Assurance Mission.

    shankar prinja
  • Yot Teerawattananon

    Yot Teerawattananon is a founding leader of the Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), which is a semi-autonomous research institute of Thailand’s Ministry of Public Health. He  provides technical advice to many national and international agencies such as: the Gates Foundation, WHO, World Bank, Asian Development Bank and the Centre for Global Development. He is also one of the founders of HTAsiaLink, a regional networks comprising of governmental health technology assessment agencies in South Korea, Japan, China, Taiwan, Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, Vietnam, Bhutan and Thailand.

    Yot